What Happens at Foreclosure Mediation?

Assisting them with professional helpMore banks, lenders, borrowers and others are turning to the process of mediation in foreclosure cases.  These cases often involve significant assets, likely the most expensive asset one of the parties owned.  The stakes are often high and both parties may be incentivized to avoid the lengthy and expensive foreclosure process.

Every mediation is unique because different parties and interests are involved.  However, they may follow a similar process.  Many mediation sessions begin with a join session in which all of the parties, their attorneys and other interested persons are present.  The mediator begins by explaining the rules of mediation and the process.  Each side of the issue has their turn to discuss their position.  The parties may speak directly to each other at this process.

From there, mediation may proceed in a joint session or the parties may break into private caucuses.  During these private caucuses, the parties share information with the mediator who then funnels information back and forth between the parties.  The mediator may provide additional information about the process of foreclosure and the disadvantages of not reaching an early intervention in the case.  He or she also communicates offers and counteroffers between the parties.

During the private caucuses, the mediator also tries to identify the interests of the parties so that he or she can propose possible solutions that will satisfy both sets of interests.  For example, the borrower may accept that he or she can no longer afford the property but may want to delay a moving date.  The lender may want to avoid having to go to court.  The mediator can propose solutions to the parties as well as ask them to generate ideas during a joint brainstorming session.

If the parties reach an agreement, they usually enter into a separate binding agreement.

About Mediation in Commercial Foreclosure Cases

Commercial foreclosures have the power to destroy a struggling business by reclaiming the property where the business is conducted.  Mediation can be employed in these situations to help the parties avoid the foreclosure process, which is often expensive, time-consuming and cumbersome.  Mediation can help the parties come together with the help of a third-party neutral to develop possible solutions.

Either party can request mediation.  The mediation can occur any time before the property has been foreclosed upon.  When the borrower and the lender go to mediation, they should come prepared with the relevant documents, including the mortgage documents, notice of sale, notices, warning letters, communications between the parties and any other documents that may be helpful in the case.

At mediation, both parties may be represented or unrepresented, depending on the rules of the particular mediation program they use and personal preference.  The lender should send someone to mediation who has the authority to modify the loan or otherwise negotiate an acceptable agreement.  The parties must mediate in good faith and not simply use the process as a way to halt the foreclosure process.

At the end of mediation, the parties either reach an agreement regarding an alternative to foreclosure such as a loan modification or the foreclosure continues.  While participating in mediation does not guarantee that foreclosure will be avoided at all costs, it does present an opportunity to potentially avoid this outcome, so there is little downside to fully participating in the process.  Often, parties learn about options that they had not been aware of or had not considered prior to mediation, such as subleasing the property or seeking a temporary forbearance if revenue is expected to pick up.  Mediation allows the parties to consider creative solutions that can help them regain financial footing.

Foreclosure Mediation in 2015’s Housing Market

Image courtesy of vectorolie / freedigitalphotos.net

Image courtesy of vectorolie / freedigitalphotos.net

The foreclosure trend that began in 2008 has slowed considerably, but is still a dominant issue in some housing markets as we enter in to 2015.  If you work in foreclosure mediation and your work hasn’t slowed considerably in the past several years, you already understand this.  By this point, foreclosure mediation is a tried-and-true method across the country to resolve the overwhelming foreclosure crisis that has hit since the recession.  Foreclosure mediation has been part of state and county legislation for some time now, and although many states are relaxing those requirements, it is still a form of ADR that seems to be widely useful as well as widely used.

According to RealtyTrac’s most recent information (November 2014), foreclosure rates in the U.S. was 1 in every 1,170 homes.  The top five states showing the most foreclosures (as of November 2014) were Florida (1 in every 462 homes), New Jersey (1 in every 478 homes), Maryland (1 in every 581 homes), Delaware (1 in every 693 homes), and Utah (1 in every 750 homes).

Following the market scare and subsequent housing bubble burst of 2008, many states created laws requiring foreclosure mediation as a requirement before a bank could foreclose on a property.  Since that time, some of the states have ended that requirement, although courts within the state still turn to foreclosure mediation to resolve what is often a backlog of foreclosures in the area. The same is true of counties and cities that have suffered the bulk of the foreclosure crisis of the past 7 years.

If you are considering adding foreclosure mediation to your specialties in the field of ADR, below is a quick overview of the process:

Foreclosure mediation—first and foremost—seeks to keep homeowners in their homes and avoid the foreclosure process.  The process involves a meeting between the homeowner(s) and lender, with a neutral third-party mediator leading the discussion.

When foreclosure mediation begins, an overview of the homeowner’s financial situation is conducted.    Through this, both the lender and the homeowner can see the exact numbers and attempt to work through a solution that allows the homeowner to either keep the home or give up the property without having a foreclosure on their credit.  This can be achieved in several ways, including revising the repayment plan, setting up forbearance, modifying the loan, or selling the home via short sale.

Can’t We Just Work This Out? How Mediation Can Save Your Home From Foreclosure

ID-100216604When a homeowner is at risk of losing their home, foreclosure mediation is not only a good idea—it’s actually required in many states.  Since mortgage companies don’t want to repossess the home or property (there is rarely income generation in the process, only income loss), they are often willing to work with a homeowner who is struggling financially or is behind in payments—and foreclosure mediation is one of the best ways to do this.

So why is foreclosure mediation an easier way to work together?  Why can’t struggling homeowners and mortgage companies work together on their own to reach a solution to the problem?  The answer is simple.  In foreclosure mediation, a neutral, third-party mediator has been trained to de-escalate tension and provide a safe environment in which negotiations can take place with minimal emotional outbursts and tension.  A foreclosure mediator can also serve as a resource to facilitate negotiations, which makes the process easier than one-on-one negotiations tend to be.

Foreclosure mediation allows the lender and the borrower to talk candidly about the financial problems the borrower is facing and how these problems can be surmounted in order for the homeowner to potentially stay in the home.  Often, this negotiation process might mean lowering the interest rate, or offering the homeowner additional time to catch up on payments.

In many states, foreclosure mediation is free to the struggling borrower and is part of the state’s effort to deal with the overwhelming foreclosures that have occurred in many places within the country since the Recession that began in 2008 (and that many are still recovering from).  While there is no guarantee that the borrower and lender will find a workable solution to the problem, foreclosure mediation at least provides the opportunity to find that solution before any major actions are taken to foreclose on the home.

Examples of Successful Landlord/Tenant Mediation

In a recent publication released by the Boston Housing Partnership (BHP), a not-for-profit organization that assists Boston-area individuals and families find and retain affordable housing, landlord/tenant mediation was suggested as a beneficial service to assist landlords and tenants find resolution to their housing disputes.

The publication also mentioned some of the disputes that are most often handled with landlord/tenant mediation, including circumstances in which:

  • An owner finds reason to evict a tenant.
  • A tenant pays rent late on a regular basis.
  • There are violations to the lease that cause problems.
  • There are personality conflicts that exist between an owner and a tenant.
  • A tenant refuses entry to the landlord, who seeks to provide inspection services or repair services to the rented property.

As examples of successful landlord/tenant mediation, BHP relates the following stories:

In one case, a tenant was not paying her rent at the first of the month and was also allowing her 12-year old son to play in the hallways of the building unsupervised.  Following landlord/tenant mediation, the tenant agreed to ensure that her child was properly supervised by enrolling him in an after-school program.  She also agreed to do better in paying her rent by the first of the month after learning of the difficulties this late payment presented for the landlord.  The tenant followed through with both agreements following mediation for the remaining year of her lease.

In the second case, the tenants were a young adult and her parents, who worked often and left the young adult at the property alone.  During these times in which the young adult was left alone, she would often invite friends over, causing disturbance for the other tenants.  In a counter-complaint, the tenants informed the landlord that their daughter had just ended an abusive relationship and there was concern that the ex-boyfriend would enter the premises through a door to the common area that was left unlocked frequently.  As a result of the mediation, the tenants agreed to formally file a restraining order against the ex-boyfriend to ensure that proper law enforcement action would be taken if he entered the premises.  They also agreed that the noise and disturbance caused by their daughter’s friends would no longer be an issue for the other tenants.  In return, the owner agreed to ensure that other tenants lock the door for further protection.

Examples of Successful Landlord/Tenant Mediation

Housing

Image courtesy of mrguilt / flickr.com

In a recent publication released by the Boston Housing Partnership (BHP), a not-for-profit organization that assists Boston-area individuals and families find and retain affordable housing, landlord/tenant mediation was suggested as a beneficial service to assist landlords and tenants find resolution to their housing disputes.

The publication also mentioned some of the disputes that are most often handled with landlord/tenant mediation, including circumstances in which:

  • An owner finds reason to evict a tenant.
  • A tenant pays rent late on a regular basis.
  • There are violations to the lease that cause problems.
  • There are personality conflicts that exist between an owner and a tenant.
  • A tenant refuses entry to the landlord, who seeks to provide inspection services or repair services to the rented property.

As examples of successful landlord/tenant mediation, BHP relates the following stories:

In one case, a tenant was not paying her rent at the first of the month and was also allowing her 12-year old son to play in the hallways of the building unsupervised.  Following landlord/tenant mediation, the tenant agreed to ensure that her child was properly supervised by enrolling him in an after-school program.  She also agreed to do better in paying her rent by the first of the month after learning of the difficulties this late payment presented for the landlord.  The tenant followed through with both agreements following mediation for the remaining year of her lease.

In the second case, the tenants were a young adult and her parents, who worked often and left the young adult at the property alone.  During these times in which the young adult was left alone, she would often invite friends over, causing disturbance for the other tenants.  In a counter-complaint, the tenants informed the landlord that their daughter had just ended an abusive relationship and there was concern that the ex-boyfriend would enter the premises through a door to the common area that was left unlocked frequently.  As a result of the mediation, the tenants agreed to formally file a restraining order against the ex-boyfriend to ensure that proper law enforcement action would be taken if he entered the premises.  They also agreed that the noise and disturbance caused by their daughter’s friends would no longer be an issue for the other tenants.  In return, the owner agreed to ensure that other tenants lock the door for further protection.

The Benefits of Banking Mediation

Legislation that was approved by the Maryland General Assembly on April 12, 2010, set a precedent for what would later become one of the best resources homeowners have to assist with stopping a foreclosure on their home—mediation.  In the process approved in Maryland, homeowners facing foreclosure were provided the opportunity to pay a $50 fee and request mediation with the lender or bank holding the home loan.  In this mediation proceeding, the homeowners were able to sit down face-to-face with the bank’s representative, a judge and a mediator to discuss options such as lowering the rate of the loan and changing the loan’s terms to make the home more affordable based on the homeowner’s changed circumstances.

This is just one example of the enormous benefit banking mediation can provide to consumers who are involved in a dispute with a banking or lending institution over everything from foreclosure notices to negligence to contracts.  Banking mediation is a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) allows the banking institution and the customer to meet face-to-face with a neutral, third-party mediator who is trained in banking law.  The process is completely confidential and often one that results in quicker resolution to a problem than other forms of dispute resolution like litigation allow.  Additionally, it is cost-effective, insuring that all parties involved in the dispute are able to reach a mutual agreement quickly and cheaply.

The banking industry is a playing ground that is ripe for disputes.  This is why banking mediation as Alternative Dispute Resolution of is such a useful tool in settling conflicts that arise in the day-to-day process of banking and financial transactions.  Disputes that can be easily solved through banking mediation include: debt collection, breach of contract, guarantor disputes, professional negligence, contributory negligence, liability issues, personal injuries, disputes on policies, assessment of damages, banking contracts, and liquidations.