Top Reasons to Consider Mediating Your Medical Malpractice Case

A claim for medical malpractice arises when a patient is injured because a healthcare provider’s care fell below the accepted standard of care. Many of these cases are litigated, but some may be mediated. People turn to the mediation process for the following reasons:

Opportunity for Improved Communication 

In many malpractice claims, an underlying problem is a feeling of betrayal or mistrust. A patient may not have an understanding of what went wrong because the medical provider may be instructed not to provide any information after a medical malpractice claim arise. Mediation allows the parties to speak personally to each other without legal advisors blocking their communication. This allows the physician an opportunity to explain factors that affected the situation, unknown medical information or other unexpected surprises. Once the parties are able to relate to each other on a more human level, they are often able to reach a fair settlement.

Cost Savings

Medical malpractice cases are often very expensive to litigate. They usually rely on medical expert testimony and these experts may charge exorbitant rates to provide court appearances, report and other litigation support. The cases also involve extensive investigations and the review of thousands of medical documents. All of this makes medical malpractice cases very expensive. Parties can avoid many of these costs by going through the mediation process. The parties can split the costs of a mediator and quickly resolve their case.

Time Savings

Due to the complexities involved in medical malpractice cases, these cases often take years to resolve, and that is before any possible appeal. Mediation can resolve a case in a matter of days once the mediation schedule is set.

Confidentiality

A medical provider may not want others to know about a mistake he or she made. Patients may not want to worry about their medical records being publicly known. Mediation is a confidential process, so it can provide important privacy to the participants.

Families in Dispute: What You Need to Know About Elder Care Mediation

Depositphotos_185049012_s-2019When a loved one is getting older and facing important decisions during the next transition in life, it is not uncommon for concerned family members to disagree about the next steps. In some situations, these disagreements can deteriorate into time-consuming, expensive and acrimonious legal battles. Having an objective professional get involved early in the process may be able to prevent or stop these battles. Below, learn more about the elder care mediation process and how it may benefit you and your family.

Role of the Mediator

A mediator is a person with a background in the areas discussed. This may be a lawyer, but very often it may be a counselor, social worker, businessperson, health care professional or other person familiar with elder care matters. The mediator asks appropriate questions and tries to find common grounds between the parties in an attempt to resolve the legal matter. The mediator does not impose any decision on the parties; the process is completely voluntary, and the parties only sign an agreement if they reach one. The mediator is objective and does not represent any party’s interests.

Benefits of the Mediation Process

Mediators can help the parties consider new options about how they can personally solve the problem they are confronting. This can help the parties develop creative solutions to their problem without judicial intervention. The parties get to maintain control over the situation instead of having a judge unfamiliar with the family imposing decisions on the parties. Additionally, mediation can provide an early resolution to problems to prevent disruption of the family unit. The parties work together to attack the problem instead of attacking each other through litigation. If the parties are able to reach an agreement, they can avoid a costly legal battle.

Why Families Choose Long-Term Care Mediation Instead of Litigation

There are a variety of problems or disagreements that can arise when long-term care is being considered by a family. The family may need to decide on which facility is most appropriate for their loved ones, based on his or her abilities and access to loved ones. They may also need to decide on how to treat a family home or which assets to liquidate to pay for care. They may have disagreements about insurance coverage. While there are many different problems that can arise when considering long-term care options, mediation can successfully resolve many of them.

The mediation process is much different than in litigation. Litigation usually involves formal proceedings in front of a judge. There may be specific procedural rules regarding what evidence can be reviewed by the court and strict timelines that must be met. Litigation is a public forum in which the general public may hear the details involved in the case. Most importantly, it is an adversarial process in which the parties are pitted as enemies against each other.

In contrast, mediation is a private and confidential process. It is much less formal, and the parties do not necessarily have to adhere to evidence requirements. The parties are encouraged to work together, so this helps strengthen the family bond instead of severing it forever. Family members are able to craft their own solutions that reflect the unique situation involving their particular family, so they often feel like an integral part of the process and are more likely to comply with the agreement they help to achieve. Many families report that they have a higher degree of satisfaction than when the case is litigated.

Key Advantages of Mediating a Libel or Defamation Claim

Libel or defamation cases arise when someone makes a negative, false statement about another person or business verbally or in writing. Mediation has been highly successful in the libel and defamation context for several reasons, including the following:

Limited Publicity

One of the most damaging aspects of a libel or defamation case is negative publicity. If the plaintiff wants to pursue the case, there is additional attention on what the negative statement is. Mediation is confidential, so there are no any unauthorized parties who will hear additional information. In litigation, there may be more exposure to the case, which can negatively impact the parties.

Opportunity to Correct Action

In litigation, the possible relief is usually very limited. A judge or jury may be empowered to award financial damages but may be unable to offer any other form of relief. In mediation, the parties may agree to a retraction, a positive review or some other action that improves the image of the plaintiff.

Cost Savings

Litigation is expensive. There may be a flurry of motions to try to dispose of the case or to reach an early resolution of it. However, these motions often involve substantial attorney time and may exponentially increase the cost of litigation. Mediation is much more affordable. The parties can save on attorneys’ fees if they are able to reach an agreement in mediation. They can also split the costs of the mediator.

Time Efficiency

Libel and defamation cases often take more than a year from the filing date to be heard. During this time, the aggrieved party may continue to suffer from the harm to his or her reputation. This may cause him or her to lose business from others or miss out on important opportunities.

Special Considerations in the Mediation of Cyber Security Cases

Three Operations Engineers Solving Problem in a Monitoring Room.Cyber security cases can arise for a number of different reasons. These cases are often complex and involve special factors that must be considered by the parties and the mediator assigned to the claim. Some special considerations include the following:

Need for Confidentiality

When a cyber security matter is at issue, digital or confidential information may be involved. It is important that there are strict confidentiality provisions in the mediation agreement. These provisions can prevent the parties from later disclosing information discussed during mediation if the parties do not reach an agreement in mediation.

Mandatory Mediation Clauses

While arbitration clauses are relatively common, mediation clauses are rising in popularity. These clauses may be part of contracts between businesses or vendors and clients. These contracts may state that mediation is required before a case can proceed in court. It may also indicate the mediation agency that will be used or how a mediator will be selected.

Subject Matter Expertise

Data breaches and other cyber security matters are relatively new, so parties may want to use a mediator who has subject matter expertise in this realm. Mediators with backgrounds in cyber security, privacy, technology and litigation may be preferred over others with a general business background.

Lack of Legal Precedent

Many cyber security matters and related legal issues are novel. Taking the case to court may result in establishing a negative precedent that can negatively impact the business in future cases. Rather than risking this possibility, the parties may agree to be bound by the terms of mediation to keep the court from being able to make a decision that impacts them for years to come.

 

Benefits of Mediating Medicare Disputes

MedicareMedicare disputes may arise when services are not provided under Medicare, billing issues are present, or an application is denied. Rather than drawing out the process through litigation, parties can agree to mediate their issue. Some ways that mediation can help with these types of disputes include:

Clear Up Misunderstandings

Oftentimes, patients or their families may be confused about eligibility criteria. Mediating a Medicare dispute can help the parties communicate better. Reasons for denial may be explained. In some situations, there may not have been enough information or the wrong patient may have been billed. Mediating – rather than litigating – the dispute can help clear up these misunderstandings. The mediator can flutter between each party and deliver information in a compassionate and professional manner.

Faster Response

Dragging out an issue in litigation can potentially take years to resolve. Through mediation, the process is expedited. Problems can be resolved much more quickly, helping to avoid periods of non-coverage or paying for necessary services.

Guaranteed Resolution

In mediation, if the parties reach an agreement, this agreement becomes a binding contract. Therefore, the patient does not have to worry that this agreement will be reneged.

Maintained Control

The parties maintain control when they decide to mediate their case. They do not have to agree to any settlement that they do not like. However, they have great latitude to reach flexible terms. They can agree to any legal resolution. In litigation, the judge makes the final decision. This often takes a great degree of control away from the parties.

Creative Solutions

If a judge makes a decision in a case, he or she is usually limited to the legal relief that can be provided. In contrast, parties who mediate their dispute can come up with flexible and creative solutions.

Resolving a Nursing Home Dispute through Mediation

Families who have a loved one in a nursing home may wind up in a dispute with a nursing home over billing issues, care provided, services, financial matters or concerns regarding abuse or neglect. Mediation is a cost-effective alternative to filing a lawsuit against a nursing home and can provide several advantages to parties.

Mediation is often voluntarily entered into by the parties, but in some cases, a court may order it, or it may be required by the nursing home contract. The parties select an objective mediator. They can choose someone with subject matter expertise, such as someone who has contract or medical malpractice experience. Because mediation is confidential, the parties can feel free to be honest and forthright with each other because what they say cannot later be used against them in a trial if they do not reach a settlement in mediation.

Mediation is effective in the nursing home setting because it allows the plaintiff to express their concerns and feel heard during the process. Litigation makes the parties adversaries and cuts off communication. With the help of a mediator, the plaintiff can communicate their concerns. The parties brainstorm and work together to reach solutions to the problem. The mediator helps filter this communication between the parties and uses special conflict-resolution skills to enhance the communication between the parties. The mediator can also provide information to the parties that can help them be better informed about their case. For example, the mediator can point out weaknesses in the parties’ case that they had not considered or how a local judge has recently ruled on a relevant issue.

The mediator works as a facilitator between the parties. If the parties are able to reach a decision, the mediator draws up a contract between them that lay out the terms of the agreement.