What Is Land Use?

Land use refers to zoning laws and other laws that regulate the use and development of real property.  Zoning is the most common form of regulation of this area and is utilized by municipalities in order to control how property is maintained and developed.  Zoning laws usually indicate which areas of the municipality that will be considered residential, commercial or industrial areas.  Such laws help to protect the value of properties and ensure that areas are optimized for their intended use.

Zoning laws also help protect the aesthetics and safety of buildings.  They may impose certain height restrictions, specify how many feet a building must be from a roadway, limit the number of rooms or buildings within a certain area, specify the types of buildings permitted in a specific area or designate certain locations for power lines.  Many municipalities utilize a master plan to help guide decisions regarding future development.

Another common source of land use is based on rights and interests of other parties.  For example, an easement is a limited right for a person to gain legal access to a portion of another person’s property.  This may be granted through a conveyance, or it may be implied by law, such as if a property is otherwise landlocked and the owners cannot have public access without crossing the land.  An easement may also exist to provide a benefit to the public, such as requiring a property owner not to build on a portion of the land so that the public can access green space or a waterway.

Land use can also involve restrictive covenants.  These are provisions included in a deed that limit a property’s use or restrict its use, such as only allowing the property to be used for residential purposes, to maintain a specific aesthetic quality and consistency with a community development or to establish a setback line.

Marital Property 101

Marital property is defined under state law.  The principles of which spouse owns which property are primarily determined by whether the spouses live in a common law property or a community property state.

Common Law Property State

The vast majority of states follow common law property principles.  These states presume that property earned or acquired during the marriage is marital property.  There are several exceptions.  For example, if the parties enter into a valid prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, this default rule does not apply.  Additionally, property owned before the marriage, received as a gift or inheritance, personal injury awards, property acquired by one spouse by using only separate property with the intent to keep it separate and property acquired during the marriage by one spouse that is deeded in only one name and not used for the benefit of the marriage are usually considered separate property.   Upon divorce, the court can consider a number of factors to determine how to equitably, but not necessarily evenly, divide the marital property.

Community Property States

The remainder of states uses the community property system.  This system is based on the idea that all assets acquired or earned during the marriage are community property to which each spouse owns 50/50.  Marital property in these states includes income, property bought with the earnings of the marriage and debts incurred during the marriage.  Property acquired prior to the marriage is considered separate property.  Gifts or inheritances to one spouse are usually considered separate property.

Personal injury awards provided to a spouse in a community property state are usually considered community property, but they are considered separate property during the divorce.  Courts usually divide the property 50/50 in the event of divorce.  There are exceptions to this general rule, such as if one spouse misappropriated community property.

Divorce Modification and Enforcement

A divorce decree often contains provisions regarding a number of key issues. It may indicate the property distribution agreement between the couple, child support orders, the parenting plan, custodial arrangements and spousal support information. Sometimes changes may require an adjustment while in others, enforcement is sought after one of the parties did not comply with the original court order.

In some instances, modification can be completed by agreement. The parties may make slight adjustments to accommodate each other. In other instances, there may be a more major change, such as a change in visitation schedule because a parent’s work schedule has changed. The parties may prefer to memorialize this change by having the judge sign off on a modification, effectively altering the original agreement.

In other instances, a party may be the target of a motion to hold him or her in contempt or a motion to modify the existing order. If the parties do not agree, the judge can hear testimony and receive evidence of why he or she should modify the order or enforce the order against one of the parties. Being found in contempt can lead to serious consequences sometimes including jail time. Contempt can also sometimes impact aspects of the case, such as visitation time.

Rather than taking part in a process which may only lead to further contention and involvement between parties who no longer want to be together, the parties may negotiate a settlement. Mediation can sometimes help parties’ at odds reach an amicable solution that is catered to the particular needs of the case. Often when one party makes a concession, the other party may be willing to make similar concessions in hopes of resolving the dispute and avoiding future litigation. Arbitration may also be considered as another alternative in order to more quickly resolve the dispute.

Background on Fathers’ Rights

For many years, fathers were relegated to the role of only being breadwinners with little attention given to any emotional comfort that they could provide their child.  Mothers were considered the natural caretaker and a father receiving greater parental rights over a mother was an uncommon occurrence unless there was extreme misconduct on the mother’s part.

However, after much research on the impact of losing a relationship with either parent, courts and legislators have modified their approach.  These establishments now recognize the importance that fathers play in their children’s lives and the impact that they have as role models, especially as same-sex role models.

This shift has caused states to pass laws that state that a preference will not be given to either parent because of their gender.  Additionally, many states have passed laws that have a presumption that joint custody shall be presumed to be in the best interest of the child in the event of divorce.

The desire for men to be more than just a paycheck has led to multiple organizations and law firms that focus only on fathers’ rights.  These entities have provided support for the Fathers’ Rights Movement, which supports fathers having as much time with their children as possible, the establishment of laws to support fathers’ rights and the establishment of processes to encourage this ongoing relationship.

Fathers’ rights organizations also help explain the rights that fathers have and how to trigger these rights.  In many locations, an unwed father must petition the court to establish his paternity in order to be recognized as a legal parent.  Additionally, many states offer a registry in which a father can ensure that he is associated with a particular child so that if the child is ever placed for adoption, he will receive notification and the ability to contest the process.

When Guardianship May Be Ordered

When referring to minors, guardianship is usually the process involved when a person who is not a parent of a minor takes over parenting responsibilities.  In essence, the court gives custody of the minor child to an adult relative, caregiver or other individual.  This term is also used to refer to someone who takes over the property of a minor child.

In some circumstances, guardianship appointments arise because of a catastrophe.  Both of the parents may have died in an accident or a single parent’s health may have declined to the extent that he or she can no longer care for the child.  Similarly, if a parent is deployed overseas and cannot take the child with him or her, a guardianship may be considered.

In other cases, guardianship may become necessary after the child was abandoned.  A parent may be unfit to raise the child at the current point in time due to financial, emotional, mental or other issues.  The parent may be suffering from substance abuse and may need to be treated at a rehabilitation center.  The parent may also be facing impending incarceration.

When making a determination regarding whether guardianship should be appointed, the family court judge may review the evidence.  The standard that the judge usually uses is to determine what is in the best interests of the child.  Each state has different factors that the court may consider, such as a history of abuse, a history of substance abuse, the child’s preferences if he or she is old enough or is able to understand and explain his or her wishes, the experiences of the potential guardian, the relationship between the potential guardian and the child and whether the child would suffer harm from being removed from his or her home in order to be placed with the guardian.

Resolving Eminent Domain Disputes Using ADR Methods

Eminent domain describes the ability of the state to take private property for public use. It is easy to understand why something like this could trigger a vicious legal battle that takes a great amount of time to resolve. Unfortunately, within that timeframe, individuals can exhaust their resources fighting the government and the project the government intended to create can go undone, which can be a detriment to society.

So what is the best way to resolve eminent domain issues? It is even possible to achieve a resolution that makes everyone happy – especially the individuals who are at the mercy of a government with vast resources and powerful attorneys?

Often, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is the best way to resolve the issue.

Eminent domain requires the state provide fair compensation in exchange for whatever property it assumed ownership over. Of course, what the government deems fair and what the owner who is losing his or her property deem fair can be light years apart. This is where ADR can have a significant impact.

What are the benefits of using ADR methods like arbitration and mediation for resolving eminent domain disputes?

ADR is confidential. It doesn’t matter if mediation or arbitration is chosen, both offer a private method for resolving legal disputes. The private information of the individual will not be accessible in public records during the process and anything that is discussed during either process cannot later be used against either party.

ADR is flexible. Using mediation or arbitration to resolve an eminent domain dispute works so well because there is an ability to tailor the resolution to suit the specific needs of those involved. In mediation, it is the disputing parties that have complete control over the outcome, so if they are willing to agree on an unorthodox solution, they are free to pursue it provided it is legal.

Eminent domain disputes can grow into ugly battles, but ADR makes them easier to resolve.

The Elements of a Sexual Harassment Case

Despite popular opinion, a valid sexual harassment case can be difficult to prove and cannot be premised on isolated events that are not serious in nature.  Instead, the employee who makes a legal claim of sexual harassment must show several elements, generally with proof by a preponderance of the evidence.

Harassment Is Because of Sex

It is not enough for an employee to be harassed in this context.  The conduct must be based on sex, such as sexually explicit comments or comments based on the employee’s gender.

Severe or Pervasive Requirement

The conduct of which the plaintiff is complaining must be severe or pervasive enough that it changes the employee’s working conditions.  This means that random horseplay or innocent flirting is not usually actionable.  Some courts have also denied claims regarding offhand comments, teasing or isolated incidents.

If the case proceeds to court, factors that are considered include how often the conduct occurred, how severe it was, whether the harassment involved threatening or humiliating conduct and whether the conduct unreasonably interfered with the employee’s work performance.  This is largely dependent on whether the conduct would be perceived by a reasonable person as being hostile or abusive.

Unwelcome

The plaintiff also has the burden of showing that the conduct was unwelcome.  This may be shown by the plaintiff presenting evidence that he or she asked the offender to stop.  This may be an issue that is highly contended in the sexual harassment context because the offender may say that the conduct was mutual and welcome.

Employer’s Liability

If the employee is seeking damages from the employer, he or she must show that the employer is liable.  This typically requires the employee to show that the employee availed himself or herself of any sexual harassment policy and that the employer failed to take proper steps to address the problem.  If the harasser is a supervisor, the employer has the burden of proof to show that no tangible employment action resulted that warrants liability.  Due to the heightened demands on the plaintiff and the employer’s desire to keep such matters private, parties may consider mediation to help resolve a sexual harassment case.